Comments on: The Healthcare Solution: California OneCare (R1)

By: superc

superc — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:49:24 +0000

Oh no, LOL if the government is “obliged” to “protect” my property, then they shouldn’t be using my money and “steal” it, according to you. It’s like an infant paying her mother for every pint of breast milk. Her mom has an “obligation” but the child pays? Forests are far away from us. Why should I be paying for forest fire containment? Those people who live there should, not me. That’s “stealing”. My body is my first property, why don’t they “protect” that first?

By: sitdown248

sitdown248 — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:52:51 +0000

First off, the government has NO oblagatiion to supply citizens with healthcare. If they do, that is going above and beyond what government originally was meant to do. Government is simply created to protect citizens from each other. Meaning no one can kill you, take what you have, or tell you what you can and cannot do. Since when is it their oblagation to extend a person’s life? What next, anytime a person has a poor life, the government has to supply them with money?

By: superc

superc — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:16:54 +0000

Aw, calm down now, “Government is simply created to protect citizens from each other.” Then why do we have public schools? Last time I checked, the constitution does not have “build fire stations and police department in every county” stipulated to it. LOL Don’t worry, the Universal Health Care for California has already been passed and just awaiting for the Governator, who enjoyed socialized health care in Austria, to sign it. It won’t affect you at all LOL. The beauty of Liberty!

By: sitdown248

sitdown248 — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:31:50 +0000

Public schools went not implemented until much further along. How many times do I need to explain this, I don’t support public schools, I believe they are wrong. However, they are already established. You are correct, those aren’t in the Constitution, but all citizens are guaranteed life, liberty, and property. The government has an oblagation to protect these

By: superc

superc — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:12:09 +0000

“all citizens are guaranteed life”
Uh… whoopsie! LOL He slipped a Freudian. Exactly. And life is certainly guaranteed by good health. Basic blood tests, CBCs, WBCs, liver panel, lipid profile, MRI, CT Scan, currently free in UK, Norway, and Sweden, Sweden having 3rd highest Life Expectancy in the world. Whooopie.

By: sitdown248

sitdown248 — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:25:00 +0000

Health is not life. A right to life means that no one can take it away. Simply not providing healthcare does not take someone’s life away. Tell me we have a right to property, does that mean we need a 100-acre farm as well? Life does not include healthcare simply because that is a means to extending it, not the right itself. If you want to enhance your rights, etc, that is your own responsiblity. Are we going to force everyone to own a gun as well?

By: axemurderer8

axemurderer8 — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:58:19 +0000

I think your comment is selfish, and ignorant. Not everyone is fortunate enough to obtain a job with decent benefits, nor make enough money to afford insurance period. I hope you loose your job and benefits and then get in a car accident so you can’t afford to fix a broken neck, and then you can think different about healthcare would be.

By: sitdown248

sitdown248 — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:22:30 +0000

My comment is not selfish. Think about this for a second. WHAT IS MORE SELFISH? Punishing people for not working, or punishing people for working? Under your system, the guy who actually does have a good job and can obtain benefits gets punished, under mine, the guy who does not have a job with benefits gets punished. I think it is much more logical to have your system benefit the working

By: axemurderer8

axemurderer8 — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:28:32 +0000

You just have a typical simple minded conservative and selfish view. I bet you also think gays shouldn’t be able to marry. and that the very fictitious Christian religion should be involved even more in our government?

By: sitdown248

sitdown248 — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:48:04 +0000

First off, I think your view of “simple minded conservative” is well…simple minded. The fact is, you cannot discount my argument, why is it considered selfish to have everyone earn their own way, and why is it unselfish to have someone else pay for you?
Gay marriage is a completely different debate. You guessed correctly on the first half, I do believe it is wrong. However, I firmly disagree that Christianity is “fictitious” and would love to talk more about that, send me a message